Ref Manual Servicing Technicians Unit 2 (Refrigerants)
2.1. Section objectives
This
chapter provides a broad overview of most of the issues associated with
refrigerants. This includes the criteria normally applied to their selection
(for example, thermodynamic properties and safety characteristics), an overview
of the various types of refrigerants and how they are identified. Particular
attention is paid to the characteristics of refrigerant blends. Although not
normally considered to be a refrigerant, the topic of refrigeration oils or
lubricants is discussed since it effectively becomes part of the working fluid
during system operation and thus requires special attention also.
The information provided here should help the reader to be
able to:
• Identify refrigerant characteristics
• Recognise the classification of refrigerants
• State the main refrigerant groups
•
Identify the
proper refrigerant for each refrigeration or air-conditioning system
•
State the
main characteristics for the most commonly-used refrigerant
• Identify the suitable lubricant for each refrigerant.
Selecting the
refrigerant
Originally when the modern
refrigerating system concept was developed in the middle of the 19th Century, a
small number of fluids were used as the working fluid, or “refrigerant”. These
included ammonia (NH3, R717), carbon dioxide (CO2, R744), sulphur dioxide,
methyl chloride and ethyl ether. However, because of the combination of
toxicity, flammability and pressure issues, these refrigerants were largely
replaced with to a “new” group of fluorinated chemicals which exhibited little
reactivity, low-toxicity and no flammability. However, during the 1980s, it was
found that these chemicals contributed to the depletion of the ozone layer,
which lead to the development of the Montreal Protocol in 1987.
The Montreal Protocol requires the cessation of
the consumption and production of all chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and since its introduction, the refrigeration
and air conditioning (RAC) industry has been engaged with the chemical
community to establish substitutes for ozone depleting refrigerants. Throughout
this time a large number of refrigerants have been introduced worldwide, of
which some are long term alternatives, and others are “transitional”
substances. With the increasing attention paid to the issue of global warming
and climate change, there is now a stronger push towards adopting alternative
refrigerants with low or no global warming potential (GWP), as well as zero
ozone depleting potential (ODP).
With the continued attention on replacement
refrigerants, coupled with the ever growing market for RAC, there are now
several hundred refrigerants that are currently commercially available. Such a
diversity of refrigerants and their variety of different characteristics can
create difficulties in handling and servicing practices for many RAC
technicians. This section aims to introduce an overview of refrigerants and
their characteristics, classifications, applications, identification and
lubricants.
There are usually two
situations that necessitate refrigerant selection, the first being for
manufacture of systems, and the second being equipment servicing. For
manufacturing RAC equipment, the refrigerant selection process is theoretically
complex, involving the consideration of huge number parameters.
|
SELECTION CRITERIA
|
THERMODYNAMIC
|
OPERATING
|
AND TRANSPORT
|
PRESSURES
|
PROPERTIES
|
|
|
ALTERNATIVES
|
CHEMICAL
|
SAFETY
|
PROPERTIES
|
CHARACTERISTICS
|
AND STABILITY
|
|

Chemical properties
and stability
The stability of a
refrigerant is linked to the way it behaves in the presence of other
substances, particularly within the refrigerating system. It is important that
the refrigerant will not react with, or act as a solvent with, any of the
materials within the system. These include metals used for pipes and other
components, compressor oils and associated additives, plastic motor materials,
elastomers in valves and fittings, and desiccants within filter dryers. This
should also be considered with respect to the small quantities of contaminants
such as moisture and air.
In general CFCs, HCFCs,
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and HCs are compatible with most materials (since
most components are designed for these refrigerants). However, many components
are designed using proprietary mixtures and additives, so there is always a
possibility of incompatibility with certain materials if an unspecified
refrigerant is used. Carbon dioxide has some compatibility problems with
certain elastomers, which is why only dedicated components for R744 should be
used with this refrigerant.
Ammonia is not compatible with many materials,
such as copper, copper alloys and many electrical wiring insulation materials.
Therefore construction metals inside ammonia systems are normally limited to
carbon steel and stainless steel.
In all cases, component
manufacturers should be consulted to check that their materials are compatible
with a non-standard refrigerant.
Operating
pressures
It is important to consider the likely operating
pressures in both the suction and discharge sides of the system. Ideally, a
refrigerant is chosen that will have an evaporating pressure above atmospheric
pressure under normal operating conditions, so as to avoid air and moisture being
drawn into the system in the event of a leak. Thus, a refrigerant should be
chosen with a normal boiling point (NBP) that is lower than the anticipated
evaporating temperature. A selected refrigerant should also have a condensing
pressure that does not exceed the pressure that the system components are
designed for, as this can have safety implications.
Thermodynamic
and transport properties
The most
important performance criteria for a refrigerating system are cooling (or
heating in the case of heat pumps) capacity and efficiency, or coefficient of
performance (COP). These performance
characteristics are influenced by a
number of properties, including:
• saturation pressure-temperature characteristics
• critical temperature
• latent heat
• density
• viscosity
• thermal conductivity
• specific heat capacity
It is important to consider the likely operating pressures in both the
suction and discharge sides of the system. Ideally, a refrigerant is
chosen that will have an evaporating pressure above atmospheric
pressure under normal operating conditions, so as to avoid air and
moisture being drawn into the system in the event of a leak. Thus, a
refrigerant should be chosen with a normal boiling point (NBP) that
is lower than the anticipated evaporating temperature. A selected
refrigerant should also have a condensing pressure that does not
exceed the pressure that the system components are designed for,
as this can have safety implications.
The capacity and COP are mainly dictated by the design and
control of the system itself (compressor, heat exchangers, piping,
etc), although the properties of the refrigerant play a part in this.
The COP can be affected by the compression ratio (which is
dictated by the saturation pressure-temperature characteristic), heat
exchanger performance and pressure losses around the system,
which are all influenced by latent heat, density, viscosity, thermal
conductivity, specific heat.
For a given evaporating and condensing temperature, the cooling
(or heating) capacity of a system is strongly influenced by the
latent heat and density of the gas entering the compressor. For
conventional systems, a fairly high critical temperature is preferred
(at least 20K above the condensing temperature), unless the
system is specially designed for operation near or above the critical
temperature, such as with R744 systems.
Safety
characteristics
|
|
|
According to various international and
national safety standards,
|
|||
Refrigerant
are classified in terms of two general safety criteria: toxicity and
|
refrigerants may be allocated one of six
safety classifications
|
|||||
according to its toxicity and flammability.
This classification
|
||||||
flammability.
|
|
|
||||
|
|
consists of two alpha-numeric characters (e.g.
A2); the capital letter
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
Toxicity: Both acute (short-term) and chronic
(long-term) toxicity
|
|
corresponds to toxicity and the digit to
flammability. The toxicity
|
||||
are considered as they affect human safety during handling and
|
|
classification is determined by a refrigerants’
TLV-TWA, such that
|
||||
servicing with refrigerants, and for occupants in refrigerated or air
|
|
it may be lower toxicity “A” or higher
toxicity “B”. There are no
|
||||
conditioned spaces. The acute-toxicity exposure limit (ATEL) is
|
|
refrigerants that are non-toxic.
|
|
|||
the maximum recommended refrigerant concentration intended to
|
|
The flammability classification may be no
flame propagation “1”,
|
||||
reduce the risks of acute toxicity hazards to humans in the event of
|
|
|||||
|
lower flammability “2” or higher flammability “3”.
|
|||||
a refrigerant release. For chronic toxicity, the threshold limit
value-
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
time weighted average (TLV-TWA) is the time -weighted average
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
concentration for a normal 8-hour workday
|
|
|
||||
and a 40-hour workweek, to which nearly all
|
|
|
||||
workers may be repeatedly exposed, day after
|
||||||
day, without adverse effect.
|
||||||
Flammability: Refrigerant flammability can
|
||||||
affect the safety of people and property
|
||||||
mainly during handling and servicing activities,
|
||||||
and it influences the design of equipment.
|
||||||
The flammability of a refrigerant is judged
|
||||||
according to the lower flammability limit
|
||||||
(LFL), which is the lowest concentration of
|
||||||
the refrigerant mixed in air, required for it to
|
||||||
be able to be ignited. Flammability is also considered according to
|
||||||
the refrigerants’ heat of combustion (HOC), which is the amount of
|

energy released when it burns.
Comments
Post a Comment